Purpose. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were used to examine the effectiveness of nursing care in the treatment of bladder cancer patients. The platforms of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to conduct a thorough literature search. Methods. The searching approach was used to find the fundamental characteristics of 5 studies. Sample size ranged from 52 to 131,852, and total sample size was 151,166. The study was looked up in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, with the most recent search being done in July 2022. Utilizing a standardized form, two independent reviewers gathered pertinent information from research that qualified as literature (17). Review Manager 5.3 used the data to examine the literature. Statistics were deemed significant at . Results. We discovered that more bladder cancer patients with T1+T2 tumor stages were receiving nursing care than those with T1+T2 tumor stages were receiving control care (mean difference =1.27, 95% CI: 1.20-1.35, ). The proportion of bladder cancer patients with T3+T4 tumor stage in the nursing care group was lower than the proportion of patients with T3+T4 tumor stage in the control group (mean difference = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14; ). The difference between the number of bladder cancer patients receiving radiotherapy in the nursing care group and the control group was not statistically significant (mean difference = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.16, ). There were fewer patients with bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy in the nursing care group than that in the control group (mean difference = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.0-0.02, ). The incidence rate of patients with bladder cancer with major complications in nursing care group was lower than that of patients with bladder cancer with major complications in control group (mean difference = 0.41 95% CI: 0.18-0.93, ). When compared to patients with bladder cancer who had serious complications in the control group, the hospital death rate for nursing care patients had a greater incidence of bladder cancer patients (mean difference = 4.64 95% CI: 4.46-4.82, ). Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the effects of nursing care reduced the incidence rate of chemotherapy and the frequency of severe problems in bladder cancer patients.

中文翻译：

---

护理对膀胱癌患者治疗的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析

目的。本研究采用系统评价和荟萃分析方法检验护理在膀胱癌患者治疗中的有效性。使用 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 的平台进行彻底的文献检索。方法。搜索方法用于查找 5 项研究的基本特征。样本量从 52 到 131,852 不等，总样本量为 151,166。该研究在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 中进行了查找，最近一次搜索是在 2022 年 7 月完成的。两位独立评审员利用标准化表格从符合文献条件的研究中收集了相关信息 (17)。Review Manager 5.3 使用数据来检查文献。统计数据被认为是重要的. 结果。我们发现接受护理的T1+T2期膀胱癌患者多于接受护理的T1+T2期膀胱癌患者（均数差=1.27, 95% CI: 1.20-1.35,）。护理组T3+T4肿瘤分期膀胱癌患者比例低于对照组T3+T4肿瘤分期患者比例（均数差=1.07；95% CI：1.01-1.14；）。护理组与对照组接受放疗的膀胱癌患者人数差异无统计学意义（均数差=1.07，95%置信区间[CI]：0.99-1.16，）。护理组接受化疗的膀胱癌患者少于对照组（均数差=-0.02，95% CI：-0.0-0.02，）。护理组膀胱癌患者出现严重并发症的发生率低于对照组膀胱癌患者出现严重并发症的发生率（均数差=0.41 95% CI：0.18-0.93，）。与对照组出现严重并发症的膀胱癌患者相比，护理患者的住院死亡率中膀胱癌患者的发病率更高（均数差=4.64 95% CI：4.46-4.82，）。 结论。这项研究表明，护理的效果降低了膀胱癌患者化疗的发生率和严重问题的频率。