This pilot study evaluated the effect of the tablet-based cognitive behavioral intervention (“Tab-CBI”) on daily steps, fatigue, and self-efficacy. Tab-CBI combined simple walking and a cognitive behavioral approach. An experimental pretest-posttest repeated measures design was used with 24 older adults. RM-ANOVA results showed a significant group difference (Tab-CBI vs. Comparison), F (1, 22) = 2.25, p =0.048 and time difference (baseline vs. week 4 vs. week 6), F (2, 44) =5.04, p =0.01 in daily steps. There was no significant group difference, F (1, 22) = 2.99, p =0.09, but significant time difference existed, F (2, 44) =2.65, p =0.04 in the PROMIS Fatigue scores. In the PROMIS Self-efficacy scores, no significant group difference, F (1, 22) = 0.02, p =0.90) was found, but significant time difference existed, F (2, 44) =3.27, p = 0.04. The findings provide preliminary evidence for the positive impact of Tab-CBI, but should be interpreted cautiously.

这项试点研究评估了基于平板电脑的认知行为干预（“Tab-CBI”）对日常步数、疲劳和自我效能的影响。Tab-CBI 结合了简单的步行和认知行为方法。对 24 名老年人进行了实验性前测-后测重复测量设计。RM-ANOVA 结果显示显着的组间差异（Tab-CBI 与比较），F (1, 22) = 2.25，p =0.048 和时间差异（基线与第 4 周与第 6 周），F (2, 44 ) =5.04，每日步数p =0.01。PROMIS 疲劳评分没有显着的组间差异，F (1, 22) = 2.99，p = 0.09，但存在显着的时间差异，F (2, 44) = 2.65，p = 0.04。在PROMIS自我效能感评分中，没有 发现显着的组间差异， F (1, 22) = 0.02，p = 0.90)，但存在显着的时间差异， F (2, 44) = 3.27，p  = 0.04。研究结果为 Tab-CBI 的积极影响提供了初步证据，但应谨慎解释。