当前位置: X-MOL 学术Energy Build. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Building circularity as a measure of sustainability in the old and modern architecture: A case study of architecture development in the hot and dry climate
Energy and Buildings ( IF 6.7 ) Pub Date : 2022-09-15 , DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112469
Shaghayegh Mohammad Hosseini Honarvar , Mahmood Golabchi , Masoumeh Bararzadeh Ledari

Nowadays, the construction industry has turned to the consumption of large amounts of natural resources in line with global population growth, which has led to the shortage of resources, and consequently increases in the construction debris; therefore, the present article has studied the positive and negative points of the architectural development process. The results have indicated that being compared to the former architecture; the development of architecture has reduced energy consumption by 78%. Hence, the scarcity of virgin resources and consequently the increase of environmental effects such as Global Warming Potential (GWP) have been measured based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). It has been illustrated that the architecture trend has increased the environmental impact of new materials by 5 times the old ones in GWP. To optimize and increase resource productivity, a review of buildings by the principles of Circular Economy (CE) has shown that 10% of old house materials and 3% of new house materials could be returned to the chain based on the CE concept. Other than reducing the GWP emissions of the construction industry and the development of zero waste systems, this paper, by replacing conventional materials with biocompatible, has been able to increase the Building Circularity (BC) by 27% in the old house and 3% in the new one, which emphasizes a regenerative approach. As a result, with this solution, more integrity would be observed between the construction environment and nature, both in the development of past architecture and in the improvement of future architecture.



中文翻译:

建筑循环性作为衡量旧建筑和现代建筑可持续性的标准:炎热干燥气候下建筑发展的案例研究

如今,随着全球人口增长,建筑业转向消耗大量自然资源,导致资源短缺,导致建筑垃圾增加;因此,本文研究了建筑开发过程的正反两点。结果表明,与以前的架构相比;建筑的发展使能源消耗减少了78%。因此,基于生命周期评估 (LCA) 测量了原始资源的稀缺性以及随之而来的全球变暖潜能值 (GWP) 等环境影响的增加。已经说明,建筑趋势已将新材料的环境影响增加了 GWP 中旧材料的 5 倍。为了优化和提高资源生产力,循环经济(CE)原则对建筑的审查表明,基于循环经济概念,10%的旧房材料和3%的新房材料可以返回链条。除了减少建筑行业的 GWP 排放和开发零废物系统外,本文通过将传统材料替换为具有生物相容性的材料,能够将老房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 27%,将旧​​房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 3%新的,强调再生方法。因此,通过这种解决方案,无论是在过去建筑的发展中,还是在未来建筑的改进中,都将观察到建筑环境与自然之间的更多完整性。循环经济(CE)原则对建筑的审查表明,基于循环经济概念,10%的旧房材料和3%的新房材料可以返回链条。除了减少建筑行业的 GWP 排放和开发零废物系统外,本文通过将传统材料替换为具有生物相容性的材料,能够将老房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 27%,将旧​​房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 3%新的,强调再生方法。因此,通过这种解决方案,无论是在过去建筑的发展中,还是在未来建筑的改进中,都将观察到建筑环境与自然之间的更多完整性。循环经济(CE)原则对建筑的审查表明,基于循环经济概念,10%的旧房材料和3%的新房材料可以返回链条。除了减少建筑行业的 GWP 排放和开发零废物系统外,本文通过将传统材料替换为具有生物相容性的材料,能够将老房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 27%,将旧​​房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 3%新的,强调再生方法。因此,通过这种解决方案,无论是在过去建筑的发展中,还是在未来建筑的改进中,都将观察到建筑环境与自然之间的更多完整性。除了减少建筑行业的 GWP 排放和开发零废物系统外,本文通过将传统材料替换为具有生物相容性的材料,能够将老房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 27%,将旧​​房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 3%新的,强调再生方法。因此,通过这种解决方案,无论是在过去建筑的发展中,还是在未来建筑的改进中,都将观察到建筑环境与自然之间的更多完整性。除了减少建筑行业的 GWP 排放和开发零废物系统外,本文通过将传统材料替换为具有生物相容性的材料,能够将老房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 27%,将旧​​房子的建筑循环度 (BC) 提高 3%新的,强调再生方法。因此,通过这种解决方案,无论是在过去建筑的发展中,还是在未来建筑的改进中,都将观察到建筑环境与自然之间的更多完整性。

更新日期:2022-09-15
down
wechat
bug