当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Sci. Technol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of Sample Preparation Techniques for the (−)ESI-FT-ICR-MS Analysis of Humic and Fulvic Acids
Environmental Science & Technology ( IF 11.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-08-15 , DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01125
Aleksandar I Goranov 1 , Amanda M Tadini 1, 2 , Ladislau Martin-Neto 2 , Alberto C C Bernardi 3 , Patricia P A Oliveira 3 , José R M Pezzopane 3 , Débora M B P Milori 2 , Stéphane Mounier 4, 5, 6, 7 , Patrick G Hatcher 1
Affiliation  

Soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Soil biogeochemistry is regularly studied by extracting the base-soluble fractions of SOM: acid-insoluble humic acid (HA) and acid-soluble fulvic acid (FA). Electrospray ionization–Fourier transform–ion cyclotron resonance–mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) is commonly utilized for molecularly characterizing these fractions. Different sample preparation techniques exist for the analysis of HA and FA though questions remain regarding data comparability following different preparations. Comparisons of different sample preparation techniques here revealed that the negative-mode ESI-FT-ICR-MS analytical window can be skewed to detect different groups of molecules, with primary differences in oxygenation, aromaticity, and molecular weight. It was also observed that HA and FA from soils versus an aquatic matrix behaved very differently. Thus, we conclude that sample preparation techniques determined to be “most optimal” in our study are in no way universal. We recommend that future studies of HA and FA involve similar comparative studies for determining the most suitable sample preparation technique for their particular type of HA or FA matrices. This will enhance data comparability among different studies and environmental systems and ultimately allow us to better understand the complex composition of environmental matrices.

中文翻译:

(−)ESI-FT-ICR-MS 分析腐殖酸和黄腐酸的样品制备技术比较

土壤有机质 (SOM) 在全球碳和氮循环中发挥着关键作用。通过提取 SOM 的碱溶性部分定期研究土壤生物地球化学:酸不溶性腐植酸 (HA) 和酸溶性黄腐酸 (FA)。电喷雾电离 - 傅立叶变换 - 离子回旋共振 - 质谱 (ESI-FT-ICR-MS) 通常用于对这些馏分进行分子表征。存在用于分析 HA 和 FA 的不同样品制备技术,尽管在不同制备后的数据可比性方面仍然存在问题。此处对不同样品制备技术的比较表明,负模式 ESI-FT-ICR-MS 分析窗口可以倾斜以检测不同的分子组,主要差异在于氧合、芳香性和分子量。还观察到来自土壤的 HA 和 FA 与水生基质的表现非常不同。因此,我们得出结论,在我们的研究中被确定为“最佳”的样品制备技术绝不是普遍的。我们建议未来对 HA 和 FA 的研究包括类似的比较研究,以确定最适合其特定类型 HA 或 FA 基质的样品制备技术。这将增强不同研究和环境系统之间的数据可比性,最终使我们能够更好地了解环境矩阵的复杂组成。我们建议未来对 HA 和 FA 的研究包括类似的比较研究,以确定最适合其特定类型 HA 或 FA 基质的样品制备技术。这将增强不同研究和环境系统之间的数据可比性,最终使我们能够更好地了解环境矩阵的复杂组成。我们建议未来对 HA 和 FA 的研究包括类似的比较研究,以确定最适合其特定类型 HA 或 FA 基质的样品制备技术。这将增强不同研究和环境系统之间的数据可比性,最终使我们能够更好地了解环境矩阵的复杂组成。
更新日期:2022-08-15
down
wechat
bug