The US Supreme Court has been busy. It recently overturned a nearly 50-year-old precedent protecting abortion rights, upheld the right to carry guns outside the home, and hamstrung the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate emissions—all while signaling an aversion to contemporary empirical evidence and instead favoring “history and tradition.” Although the majority of Americans disagree with many of these decisions, the court has only just begun to reshape the country. When it resumes in October, the court will be poised to outlaw affirmative action, undercut federal regulations regarding clean water, and possibly allow state legislatures to restrict voting rights without oversight by state courts. What explains the court’s shift to an ideological extreme, and what can be done about it?

中文翻译：

---

拯救最高法院和民主

美国最高法院一直很忙。它最近推翻了一个有近 50 年历史的保护堕胎权的先例，维护了在家外携带枪支的权利，并阻碍了环境保护署监管排放的能力——同时表明了对当代经验证据的厌恶，而是倾向于“历史和传统。” 尽管大多数美国人不同意其中的许多决定，但法院对国家的重塑才刚刚开始。当它在 10 月恢复时，法院将准备取缔平权行动，削弱有关清洁水的联邦法规，并可能允许州立法机构在不受州法院监督的情况下限制投票权。什么解释了法院转向意识形态极端的原因，以及可以做些什么呢？