ABSTRACT

Addition to historic buildings is an act of planning which integrates the preservation of architectural testimonies while at the same time enabling local development. Building additions are planned and designed under restrictions and regulations and are developed and supervised mainly by global organizations. Additions may be considered a compromise between expanding historic buildings and accentuating the historic buildings’ important values.

The discussion on the ontological perspective of conservation aspects is directly related to additions. According to conservation discourse, designs of additions are derived after scrutinizing and evaluating the historic building. Therefore, the addition should be visualized differently from both past and present architectural representations. A method to appraise historic buildings’ additions is needed to evaluate and justify them. The historic building and its addition are combined as separate entities, and therefore a new term has been proposed to describe this symbiosis: A Combined But-Not Unified Entity (CBNUE).

In this article, I propose adding another layer of examination of the CBNUE reciprocity through parasitic and prosthetic architecture theories. This examination challenges the design of additions and offers an alternative view of additions that can be considered appropriate according to international guidelines. Thus, the addition can be considered appropriate within the context of an image of a parasite or a prosthesis.

摘要

历史建筑的扩建是一种规划行为，它整合了建筑遗迹的保护，同时促进了当地的发展。建筑加建是根据限制和法规规划和设计的，主要由全球组织开发和监督。扩建可以被认为是扩建历史建筑和强调历史建筑重要价值之间的折衷。

关于保护方面的本体论视角的讨论与添加直接相关。根据保护论述，加建的设计是在审查和评估历史建筑后得出的。因此，增建的视觉效果应该不同于过去和现在的建筑表现形式。需要一种评估历史建筑增建的方法来评估和证明它们的合理性。这座历史建筑及其附属建筑被合并为独立的实体，因此提出了一个新术语来描述这种共生关系：合并但不统一的实体 (CBNUE)。

在这篇文章中，我建议通过寄生和假体结构理论添加另一层 CBNUE 互惠性检查。该检查挑战了添加物的设计，并提供了根据国际准则可以认为合适的添加物的替代观点。因此，在寄生虫或假体图像的背景下，添加可以被认为是合适的。