Annals of the International Communication Association Pub Date : 2022-08-08 , DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2022.2108880 Nicholas David Bowman 1 , Eike Mark Rinke 2 , Eun-Ju Lee 3 , Robin Nabi 4 , Claes H. de Vreese 5
ABSTRACT
While perspectives on open scholarship practices (OSPs) in Communication are noted in editorials and position papers, as a discipline we lack data-driven insights into how the larger community understands, feels about, engages in, and supports OSPs – insights that could inform current conversations about OSPs in Communication and document how the field shifts in response to ongoing discourses around OS in the current moment. A mixed-methodological survey of International Communication Association members (N = 330) suggested widespread familiarity with and support for some OSPs, but less engagement with them. In open-ended responses, respondents expressed several concerns, including reservations about unclear standards, presumed incompatibility with scholarly approaches, fears of a misuse of shared materials, and perceptions of a toxic culture surrounding open scholarship.
中文翻译:
传播学者如何看待开放奖学金
摘要
虽然在社论和立场文件中提到了关于传播领域开放奖学金实践 (OSP) 的观点,但作为一门学科,我们缺乏数据驱动的洞察力,无法了解更大的社区如何理解、感受、参与和支持 OSP——这些洞察力可以为当前提供信息关于通信中 OSP 的对话,并记录该领域如何响应当前围绕 OS 的持续讨论而发生变化。国际传播协会成员的混合方法调查(N = 330) 表明对某些 OSP 的广泛熟悉和支持,但与他们的接触较少。在开放式回答中,受访者表达了一些担忧,包括对不明确的标准持保留态度,假定与学术方法不兼容,担心共享材料被滥用,以及对围绕开放学术的有毒文化的看法。