当前位置: X-MOL 学术Perspect. Psychol. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Computing Components of Everyday Stress Responses: Exploring Conceptual Challenges and New Opportunities
Perspectives on Psychological Science ( IF 12.6 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-29 , DOI: 10.1177/17456916221082108
Joshua M Smyth 1 , Matthew J Zawadzki 2 , David Marcusson-Clavertz 3 , Stacey B Scott 4 , Jillian A Johnson 1 , Jinhyuk Kim 5 , Meynard J Toledo 1 , Robert S Stawski 6 , Martin J Sliwinski 7 , David M Almeida 7
Affiliation  

Repeated assessments in everyday life enables collecting ecologically valid data on dynamic, within-persons processes. These methods have widespread utility and application and have been extensively used for the study of stressors and stress responses. Enhanced conceptual sophistication of characterizing intraindividual stress responses in everyday life would help advance the field. This article provides a pragmatic overview of approaches, opportunities, and challenges when intensive ambulatory methods are applied to study everyday stress responses in “real time.” We distinguish between three stress-response components (i.e., reactivity, recovery, and pileup) and focus on several fundamental questions: (a) What is the appropriate stress-free resting state (or “baseline”) for an individual in everyday life? (b) How does one index the magnitude of the initial response to a stressor (reactivity)? (c) Following a stressor, how can recovery be identified (e.g., when the stress response has completed)? and (d) Because stressors may not occur in isolation, how can one capture the temporal clustering of stressors and/or stress responses (pileup)? We also present initial ideas on applying this approach to intervention research. Although we focus on stress responses, these issues may inform many other dynamic intraindividual constructs and behaviors (e.g., physical activity, physiological processes, other subjective states) captured in ambulatory assessment.



中文翻译:

计算日常压力反应的组成部分:探索概念挑战和新机遇

日常生活中的反复评估能够收集关于动态的、人的内部过程的生态学有效数据。这些方法具有广泛的效用和应用,并已广泛用于应激源和应激反应的研究。增强日常生活中个体压力反应特征的概念复杂性将有助于推动该领域的发展。本文提供了一个务实的概述,介绍了在应用强化门诊方法“实时”研究日常压力反应时的方法、机遇和挑战。我们区分了三个压力响应组件(即反应性、恢复和堆积),并关注几个基本问​​题:(a) 一个人在日常生活中合适的无压力休息状态(或“基线”)是什么?(b) 如何衡量对压力源的初始反应(反应性)的大小?(c) 在应激源之后,如何确定恢复(例如,当应激反应完成时)?(d) 由于压力源可能不会孤立发生,因此如何捕捉压力源和/或压力反应(堆积)的时间聚集?我们还提出了将这种方法应用于干预研究的初步想法。虽然我们专注于压力反应,但这些问题可能会影响动态评估中捕获的许多其他动态个体内部结构和行为(例如,身体活动、生理过程、其他主观状态)。如何确定恢复(例如,压力反应何时完成)?(d) 由于压力源可能不会孤立发生,因此如何捕捉压力源和/或压力反应(堆积)的时间聚集?我们还提出了将这种方法应用于干预研究的初步想法。虽然我们专注于压力反应,但这些问题可能会影响动态评估中捕获的许多其他动态个体内部结构和行为(例如,身体活动、生理过程、其他主观状态)。如何确定恢复(例如,压力反应何时完成)?(d) 由于压力源可能不会孤立发生,因此如何捕捉压力源和/或压力反应(堆积)的时间聚集?我们还提出了将这种方法应用于干预研究的初步想法。虽然我们专注于压力反应,但这些问题可能会影响动态评估中捕获的许多其他动态个体内部结构和行为(例如,身体活动、生理过程、其他主观状态)。

更新日期:2022-07-29
down
wechat
bug