当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Social Issues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The cost of intersectionality: Motherhood, mental health, and the state of the country
Journal of Social Issues ( IF 5.418 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-23 , DOI: 10.1111/josi.12539
Jasmine L. Garland McKinney 1 , LaReine M. Meinersmann 1
Affiliation  

The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and society's overdue racial awakening (Worland, 2020) have created distinct needs for mothers, especially mothers of Color (MOC) in the United States (US) (Breman et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). Prior to the double pandemic (see Addo, 2020), expectations that mothers devote themselves entirely to their children may support increases in mental health symptomology within this population (Rahman et al., 2013). Based on systemic inequities that reside at the foundation of many institutions (e.g., healthcare, law, education) within the US, MOC experience increased worry, anxiety, stress, and fear during the double pandemic (Liu et al., 2021). In addition, MOC engage in mothering practices (e.g., racial socialization) that are unique to raising children who identify as Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC) (Hughes & Chen et al., 1997). Based on these facts, the authors investigate the sociocultural forces that impact MOC's mental health during the context of the double pandemic through a review of existent literature on this topic. The authors’ analysis and incorporation of intersectionality theory and Black feminist thought uncovers the ways in which these forces may influence the experiences of MOC. Finally, the authors utilize an intersectional-based policy analysis framework (Hankivsky et al., 2014) to provide recommendations for social policy, education and training, and directions for future research. These recommendations acknowledge the influence of power and privilege in the US while building upon the protective factors that support MOC.

中文翻译:

交叉性的代价:母亲、心理健康和国家状况

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和社会迟来的种族觉醒(Worland,2020)为母亲,特别是美国(US)的有色人种母亲(MOC)创造了独特的需求(Breman等人,2021;Liu等人)等,2021)。在双重大流行之前(参见 Addo,2020),对母亲完全奉献给孩子的期望可能会支持该人群心理健康症状的增加(Rahman 等,2013)。基于美国许多机构(例如医疗保健、法律、教育)基础存在的系统性不平等,MOC 在双重大流行期间经历了更多的担忧、焦虑、压力和恐惧(Liu 等人,2021)。此外,MOC 还采取独特的养育做法(例如种族社会化)来养育黑人、土著、和有色人种 (BIPOC)(Hughes & Chen 等,1997)。基于这些事实,作者通过回顾有关该主题的现有文献,调查了在双重大流行背景下影响 MOC 心理健康的社会文化力量。作者对交叉理论和黑人女权主义思想的分析和结合揭示了这些力量可能影响 MOC 经历的方式。最后,作者利用基于交叉的政策分析框架(Hankivsky 等,2014)为社会政策、教育和培训以及未来研究方向提供建议。这些建议承认美国权力和特权的影响,同时建立在支持 MOC 的保护性因素的基础上。作者通过回顾有关该主题的现有文献,调查了在双重大流行背景下影响 MOC 心理健康的社会文化力量。作者对交叉理论和黑人女权主义思想的分析和结合揭示了这些力量可能影响 MOC 经历的方式。最后,作者利用基于交叉的政策分析框架(Hankivsky 等,2014)为社会政策、教育和培训以及未来研究方向提供建议。这些建议承认美国权力和特权的影响,同时建立在支持 MOC 的保护性因素的基础上。作者通过回顾有关该主题的现有文献,调查了在双重大流行背景下影响 MOC 心理健康的社会文化力量。作者对交叉理论和黑人女权主义思想的分析和结合揭示了这些力量可能影响 MOC 经历的方式。最后,作者利用基于交叉的政策分析框架(Hankivsky 等,2014)为社会政策、教育和培训以及未来研究方向提供建议。这些建议承认美国权力和特权的影响,同时建立在支持 MOC 的保护性因素的基础上。
更新日期:2022-07-23
down
wechat
bug