Traditionally, prosociality has been conceptualized in terms of the interpersonal domain, for example, helping behavior. Nevertheless, people can be prosocial in terms of ideological domains, for example, social policies they support. The present study examined the utility of distinguishing interpersonal and ideological prosocial values as predictors of well-being and social capital. Data from nine European Social Surveys were combined. The Universalism and Benevolence values of Schwartz's basic human values were treated as measures of ideological and interpersonal prosocial values. Relationships between Universalism and Benevolence and well-being and social capital were examined with multilevel models, persons nested with rounds, rounds nested within countries. Respondent sex, age, and education were included as covariates. These analyses found that Benevolence was positively related to satisfaction with life and happiness, whereas Universalism was negatively related to satisfaction with life and happiness. Although endorsing both values was positively related to attitudinal measures of social capital (e.g., people can be trusted), Universalism was negatively related to self-reports of social activity, whereas Benevolence was either positively related or unrelated to self-reports of social activity. Being ideologically prosocial appears to be associated with reduced well-being. Future research is needed to explain the mechanisms responsible for this relationship.

中文翻译：

---

意识形态亲社会的代价：2002 年至 2018 年欧洲社会调查的分析发现，认可普遍主义价值观与福祉和社会资本之间存在负相关关系

传统上，亲社会性是根据人际关系领域来概念化的，例如，帮助行为。然而，人们在意识形态领域可能是亲社会的，例如，他们支持的社会政策。本研究检验了区分人际关系和意识形态亲社会价值观作为幸福感和社会资本预测指标的效用。合并了九项欧洲社会调查的数据。施瓦茨的基本人类价值观中的普遍主义和仁慈价值观被视为意识形态和人际亲社会价值观的衡量标准。普遍主义与仁慈的关系福祉和社会资本通过多层次模型进行检验，人员嵌套在轮次中，轮次嵌套在国家内。受访者的性别、年龄和教育程度作为协变量。这些分析发现，仁​​爱与生活满意度和幸福感呈正相关，而普世主义与生活满意度和幸福感呈负相关。虽然支持这两种价值观与社会资本的态度措施正相关（例如，人们可以信任），但普遍主义与社会活动的自我报告负相关，而仁慈与社会活动的自我报告呈正相关或无关。在意识形态上亲社会似乎与幸福感下降有关。未来的研究需要解释造成这种关系的机制。