当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Open science: Friend, foe, or both to an antiracist psychology?
Psychological Review ( IF 5.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-14 , DOI: 10.1037/rev0000386
Milton A Fuentes 1 , David G Zelaya 2 , Edward A Delgado-Romero 3 , Mamona Butt 1
Affiliation  

The open science framework has garnered increased visibility and has been partially implemented in recent years. Open science underscores the importance of transparency and reproducibility to conduct rigorous science. Recently, several journals published by the American Psychological Association have begun adopting the open science framework. At the same time, the field of psychology has been reckoning with the current sociopolitical climate regarding anti-Blackness and White supremacy. As psychology begins to adopt the open science framework into its journals, the authors underscore the importance of embracing and aligning open science with frameworks and theories that have the potential to move the field toward antiracism and away from the embedded White supremacy value systems and ideals. The present article provides an overview of the open science framework; an examination of White supremacy ideology in research and publishing; guidance on how to move away from these pernicious values; and a proposal on alternate value systems to center equity, diversity, and inclusion with the aim of establishing an antiracist open science framework.

中文翻译:

开放科学:反种族主义心理学是朋友、敌人还是两者兼而有之?

近年来,开放科学框架的知名度不断提高,并已得到部分实施。开放科学强调透明度和可重复性对于进行严谨的科学的重要性。最近,美国心理学会出版的几本期刊已经开始采用开放科学框架。与此同时,心理学领域一直在考虑当前反黑人和白人至上的社会政治氛围。随着心理学开始在其期刊中采用开放科学框架,作者强调了拥抱开放科学并将其与框架和理论结合起来的重要性,这些框架和理论有可能使该领域走向反种族主义并远离根深蒂固的白人至上价值体系和理想。本文概述了开放科学框架;对研究和出版中的白人至上意识形态的审查;关于如何摆脱这些有害价值观的指导;以及关于以公平、多样性和包容性为中心的替代价值体系的提案,旨在建立反种族主义的开放科学框架。
更新日期:2022-07-15
down
wechat
bug