当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Occup. Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The clinical consequence of using less than four sensory perception examination methods in the Swedish surveillance system for Hand-Arm vibration syndrome
Journal of Occupational Health ( IF 3 ) Pub Date : 2022-07-05 , DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12343
Carl Antonson 1 , Frida Thorsén 2 , Catarina Nordander 1
Affiliation  

The Swedish surveillance system aiming to reveal undetected Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) in workers exposed for vibrations is regulated by the provision AFS 2019:3. The goal for the surveillance system is to diagnose HAVS, as well as to find workers at risk for developing HAVS due to other conditions. The national guidelines stipulate examination using at least two out of four hand sensory examination methods (SEM); monofilament (touch), two-point discrimination (discriminative), tuning fork (vibrotactile), and Rolltemp (thermotactile). The aim of this study was to examine the clinical consequence of using less than four of these SEMs.

中文翻译:

在瑞典手臂振动综合征监测系统中使用少于四种感官知觉检查方法的临床后果

旨在揭示暴露于振动的工人中未检测到的手臂振动综合症 (HAVS) 的瑞典监测系统受 AFS 2019:3 条款的监管。监测系统的目标是诊断 HAVS,以及发现因其他情况而有患 HAVS 风险的工人。国家指南规定至少使用四种手部感官检查方法(SEM)中的两种进行检查;单丝(触摸)、两点辨别(辨别)、音叉(振动触觉)和 Rolltemp(热触觉)。本研究的目的是检查使用少于四个这些 SEM 的临床结果。
更新日期:2022-07-06
down
wechat
bug