当前位置: X-MOL 学术Body Image › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Body and Appearance Self-Conscious Emotions Scale (BASES): A comprehensive examination of its factorial validity, with recommendations for researchers
Body Image ( IF 5.580 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-21 , DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.06.009
Viren Swami 1 , Christophe Maïano 2 , Alexandre J S Morin 3
Affiliation  

The 16-item Body and Appearance Self-Conscious Emotions Scale (BASES) is widely used to assess the discrete emotions of guilt, shame, authentic pride, and hubristic pride. However, recent work has questioned the factorial validity of the BASES (i.e., the extent to which it truly assesses a discrete set of self-conscious emotions). In the present study, we re-assessed the factorial validity of the BASES using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). An online sample of adults from the United Kingdom (N = 637) were asked to complete the BASES. Our analyses indicated that the original 4-factor CFA model had adequate fit but resulted in very high latent correlations between similarly valenced facets (Guilt/Shame and Authentic/Hubristic Pride, respectively). An alternative 2-factor CFA model (combining Guilt-Shame and Authentic-Hubristic Pride) had a less-than-ideal fit. Conversely, 4-factor and 2-factor ESEM solutions both resulted in a superior fit to the data than their CFA counterparts, and in reduced estimates of factor correlations. Both of these ESEM solutions were also fully invariant across gender. These results have important theoretical and practical implications for our understanding of body and appearance-related self-conscious emotions and how this construct is currently measured.



中文翻译:

身体和外表自我意识情绪量表 (BASES):对其因子有效性的全面检查,并为研究人员提供建议

包含 16 个项目的身体和外表自我意识情绪量表 (BASES) 被广泛用于评估内疚、羞耻、真实自豪和傲慢自豪等离散情绪。然而,最近的工作质疑 BASES 的阶乘有效性(即,它真正评估一组离散的自我意识情绪的程度)。在本研究中,我们使用验证性因子分析 (CFA) 和探索性结构方程模型 (ESEM) 重新评估了 BASES 的因子有效性。来自英国的成人在线样本(N = 637) 被要求完成基础。我们的分析表明,最初的 4 因子 CFA 模型具有足够的拟合度,但导致相似价方面(分别为内疚/羞耻和真实/自大骄傲)之间的潜在相关性非常高。另一种 2 因素 CFA 模型(结合了内疚-羞耻和真实自傲的骄傲)的拟合度不太理想。相反,4 因子和 2 因子 ESEM 解决方案都比 CFA 解决方案更适合数据,并降低了因子相关性的估计。这两种 ESEM 解决方案在性别之间也是完全不变的。这些结果对于我们理解与身体和外表相关的自我意识情绪以及目前如何测量这种结构具有重要的理论和实践意义。

更新日期:2022-06-22
down
wechat
bug