当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Policy Anal. Manag. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Veteran Educators or For-Profiteers? Tuition Responses to Changes in the Post-9/11 GI Bill
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management ( IF 3.917 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-19 , DOI: 10.1002/pam.22408
Matthew Baird , Michael S. Kofoed , Trey Miller , Jennie Wenger

In 2010, Congress reauthorized the Post-9/11 GI Bill by changing reimbursement rates from by-state maximums to a nationwide limit. This policy created exogenous variation in financial aid for veterans at private universities. We detect changes in tuition only for for-profit colleges, where we estimate a 1 percent pass-through rate. This response is mainly from states with decreased benefits; colleges with more veterans, and colleges whose pre-change tuition was above the state maximum but below the new nationwide level had a pass-through rate of 8 percent. We also find a negative association between changes in benefits and overall student enrollment for for-profit colleges.

中文翻译:

资深教育家还是营利者?学费对 9/11 后 GI 法案变化的反应

2010 年,国会通过将报销率从各州最高限额更改为全国限额,重新授权了 9/11 后 GI 法案。这项政策在私立大学退伍军人的经济援助方面造成了外生差异。我们仅检测营利性大学的学费变化,我们估计有 1% 的通过率。这种反应主要来自福利减少的州;退伍军人较多的大学,以及变更前学费高于州最高但低于全国新水平的大学的通过率为8%。我们还发现福利变化与营利性大学的整体学生入学率之间存在负相关。
更新日期:2022-06-19
down
wechat
bug