Given the recent focus on powered haulage incidents within the US mining sector, an appraisal of collision avoidance/warning systems (CXSs) through the lens of the available research literature is timely. This paper describes a rapid review that identifies, characterizes, and classifies the research literature to evaluate the maturity of CXS technology through the application of a Technology Readiness Assessment. Systematic search methods were applied to three electronic databases, and relevant articles were identified through the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sixty-four articles from 2000 to 2020 met these criteria and were categorized into seven CXS technology categories. Review and assessment of the articles indicates that much of the literature-based evidence for CXS technology lies within lower levels of maturity (i.e., components and prototypes tested under laboratory conditions and in relevant environments). However, less evidence exists for CXS technology at higher levels of maturity (i.e., complete systems evaluated within operational environments) despite the existence of commercial products in the marketplace. This lack of evidence at higher maturity levels within the scientific literature highlights the need for systematic peer-reviewed research to evaluate the performance of CXS technologies and demonstrate the efficacy of prototypes or commercial products, which could be fostered by more collaboration between academia, research institutions, manufacturers, and mining companies. Additionally, results of the review reveal that most of the literature relevant to CXS technologies is focused on vehicle-to-vehicle interactions. However, this contrasts with haul truck fatal accident statistics that indicate that most haul truck fatal accidents are due to vehicle-to-environment interactions (e.g., traveling through a berm). Lastly, the relatively small amount of literature and segmented nature of the included studies suggests that there is a need for incremental progress or more stepwise research that would facilitate the improvement of CXS technologies over time. This progression over time could be achieved through continued long-term interest and support for CXS technology research.

鉴于最近对美国采矿业内动力运输事件的关注，通过现有研究文献的视角对防撞/警告系统 (CXS) 进行评估是及时的。本文描述了一项快速审查，该审查通过应用技术准备评估来识别、描述和分类研究文献，以评估 CXS 技术的成熟度。将系统搜索方法应用于三个电子数据库，并通过应用包含和排除标准来识别相关文章。2000 年至 2020 年的 64 篇文章符合这些标准，并被分为七个 CXS 技术类别。对文章的审查和评估表明，CXS 技术的许多基于文献的证据都处于较低的成熟度水平（即，在实验室条件和相关环境中测试的组件和原型）。然而，尽管市场上存在商业产品，但成熟度较高的 CXS 技术（即在操作环境中评估的完整系统）的证据较少。科学文献中缺乏更高成熟度水平的证据突出表明需要系统的同行评审研究来评估 CXS 技术的性能并证明原型或商业产品的功效，这可以通过学术界、研究机构之间的更多合作来促进、制造商和矿业公司。此外，审查结果表明，大多数与 CXS 技术相关的文献都集中在车辆与车辆的交互上。然而，这与运输卡车致命事故统计数据形成对比，后者表明大多数运输卡车致命事故是由于车辆与环境的相互作用（例如，通过护堤行驶）造成的。最后，相对较少的文献和纳入研究的分段性质表明，需要渐进式进展或更逐步的研究，以促进 CXS 技术随着时间的推移而改进。随着时间的推移，这种进展可以通过对 CXS 技术研究的持续长期兴趣和支持来实现。所纳入研究的文献数量相对较少且具有分段性质，这表明需要进行渐进式或更逐步的研究，以随着时间的推移促进 CXS 技术的改进。随着时间的推移，这种进展可以通过对 CXS 技术研究的持续长期兴趣和支持来实现。所纳入研究的文献数量相对较少且具有分段性质，这表明需要进行渐进式或更逐步的研究，以随着时间的推移促进 CXS 技术的改进。随着时间的推移，这种进展可以通过对 CXS 技术研究的持续长期兴趣和支持来实现。