This paper contributes to a renewed understanding of markets in transition studies by focusing on how unknown things must be ‘framed’ and pacified in order to be attributed some ‘value’ that makes them ‘matter’. We empirically analyze the making of a market agencement for wind power deployment in Denmark. Using an analytical framework of framing and pacifying, we trace three entangled ‘domains of action’ associated with the employment of (a) sociopolitical devices to enable the discursive valuation of wind power, (b) economic devices to develop price-setting models for investors, and (c) technical devices to facilitate grid integration, thereby framing wind power as socio-politically, economically, and techno-scientifically ‘valuable’, respectively. This market agencement has consistently produced concerns (i.e., overflows) requiring constant re-framing. We discuss how the lens of markets-in-the-making can contribute to transition studies. By showing how the domains of action entangle and ‘overflow’ onto each other, this study demonstrates that the relational lens of socio-technical agencements can help shed additional light on the dynamics and agency of markets in transition.

本文通过关注必须如何“框定”和安抚未知事物，以便赋予某些“价值”，使它们“重要”，从而有助于重新理解转型研究中的市场。我们实证分析了丹麦风电部署市场代理的制定。使用框架和安抚的分析框架，我们追踪三个纠缠不清的“行动领域”，这些“行动领域”与（a）社会政治手段以实现风电的话语估值，（b）经济手段为投资者开发定价模型相关(c) 促进电网整合的技术设备，从而将风电分别界定为具有社会政治、经济和技术科学“价值”。这种市场代理一直引起关注（即，溢出）需要不断的重新构图。我们讨论了市场的视角如何有助于转型研究。通过展示行动领域如何相互纠缠和“溢出”，本研究表明，社会技术推动的关系透镜有助于进一步了解转型市场的动态和代理。