In this commentary, I highlight flaws in the article by Woo and colleagues (this issue) that undermine its credibility and utility as rigorous science that contributes to the field. I do so by discussing (a) the concept of epistemic oppression regarding the glaring exclusion of multiple germane bodies of research and (b) the importance of including construct validity within a psychometric article regarding the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). I conclude with a plea to the authors that the matter of anti-Black violence and murder, which they reference, is one to be taken respectfully, seriously, and somberly.

中文翻译：

---

认知压迫、建构有效性和科学严谨性：对 Woo 等人的评论。(2022)

在这篇评论中，我强调了 Woo 及其同事（本期）文章中的缺陷，这些缺陷破坏了其作为对该领域做出贡献的严谨科学的可信度和实用性。为此，我讨论了 (a) 关于明显排除多个相关研究机构的认知压迫的概念，以及 (b) 在关于研究生入学考试 (GRE) 的心理测量文章中包含结构效度的重要性。最后，我恳求作者们，他们提到的反黑人暴力和谋杀问题应该得到尊重、严肃和严肃的对待。