当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Prediction of serious misconduct in law enforcement officers.
Psychological Assessment ( IF 6.083 ) Pub Date : 2022-06-09 , DOI: 10.1037/pas0001146
Alec T Twibell 1 , Robert E McGrath 1 , Matthew Guller 2
Affiliation  

This study compared 143 law enforcement officers with a history of serious misconduct and 429 matched comparators who had completed the Candidate and Officer Personnel Survey–Revised (COPS–R), an inventory developed specifically for psychological evaluation of public safety candidates. Most had also completed the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), which allowed for scoring of scales and indices from the PAI Police and Public Safety Report (PAI-PPSR), as well as the recently developed PAI-Plus. Correlations and t tests indicated significant small group differences on seven COPS–R scales and one PAI-Plus index. Analyses were repeated for officers with substance use-related problems compared with nonproblem officers. These identified four COPS–R and two PAI-PPSR scales that were significant predictors. Relative risk ratio analyses indicated the clinical utility of these scales at certain cutoff scores in predicting serious misconduct in law enforcement officers and candidates.

中文翻译:

预测执法人员的严重不当行为。

这项研究比较了 143 名有严重不当行为历史的执法人员和 429 名已完成候选人和官员人事调查修订版 (COPS-R) 的匹配比较者,该调查是专门为公共安全候选人的心理评估而开发的。大多数人还完成了人格评估量表 (PAI),它允许对 PAI 警察和公共安全报告 (PAI-PPSR) 以及最近开发的 PAI-Plus 中的量表和指数进行评分。相关性和t测试表明在七个 COPS-R 量表和一个 PAI-Plus 指数上存在显着的小组差异。与没有问题的官员相比,对有物质使用相关问题的官员进行了重复分析。这些确定了四个 COPS-R 和两个 PAI-PPSR 量表,它们是重要的预测因子。相对风险比分析表明,这些量表在某些临界值下在预测执法人员和候选人的严重不当行为方面具有临床效用。
更新日期:2022-06-10
down
wechat
bug