当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Architecture › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Corbusian space and urban corpus: the Unité d’habitation in Marseille and the Bastide town of Monpazier
The Journal of Architecture Pub Date : 2021-10-03 , DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2021.1976813
Christoph Lueder 1
Affiliation  

Le Corbusier’s multi-layered understanding of corporeality evolved through successive appropriations and dismissals of contrasting theories, experiences, and paradigms. In his unpublished manuscript La Construction des villes (1910), he enthusiastically endorsed Camillo Sitte’s conception of space as an emanation of the human body, predicated solely on its physiological effect; and he dismissed urban structures that are legible in plan but not sensorially comprehensible as irrelevant. However, in Urbanisme (1925) he polemically inverted his earlier position, deriding Sitte’s physiology and exhorting the virtues of rational planning and pure geometry dissociated from the human body. Intriguingly, Le Corbusier’s reference to the Bastide town of Monpazier (1284) in Urbanisme and the photographs that he archived suggest the third reading of corporalité, with a nuance and ambiguity that transcends either of his earlier polemical positions. The medieval founders of Monpazier conceived of the city as a substitute for the political body of their king. Monpazier is experienced both as a singular, cohesive urban corpus and as an agglomeration of separate houses. Le Corbusier’s Unité d’habitation (1947–1952) extends this genealogy of twofold readings. While the Unité confronts its visitors as a standing, singular corpus of a vertical city, its façade exposes a diagrammatic representation of its urban assemblage of maisonettes.

中文翻译:

Corbusian 空间和城市语料库:马赛的 Unité d'habitation 和 Bastide 镇 Monpazier

勒柯布西耶对肉体的多层次理解是通过对对比理论、经验和范式的连续挪用和摒弃而发展起来的。在他未发表的手稿 La Construction des villes(1910 年)中,他热情地支持卡米洛·西特(Camillo Sitte)将空间视为人体散发的概念,仅基于其生理效应。他认为那些在平面上清晰但在感官上无法理解的城市结构是无关紧要的。然而,在 Urbanisme (1925) 中,他颇有争议地颠倒了他先前的立场,嘲笑 Sitte 的生理学,并鼓吹理性规划和与人体分离的纯几何学的优点。耐人寻味的是,勒柯布西耶在 Urbanisme 中提到的巴斯蒂德小镇 Monpazier(1284 年)以及他存档的照片暗示了对 corporalité 的第三次解读,其细微差别和模棱两可超越了他早期的任何一个争论立场。Monpazier 的中世纪创始人认为这座城市可以替代他们国王的政治机构。Monpazier 既是一个单一的、有凝聚力的城市语料库,也是一个独立房屋的聚集体。勒柯布西耶的 Unité d'habitation (1947-1952) 扩展了这种双重解读的谱系。虽然 Unité 将游客视为垂直城市的一个站立的、独特的主体,但它的立面展示了其城市公寓组合的图解表示。Monpazier 的中世纪创始人认为这座城市可以替代他们国王的政治机构。Monpazier 既是一个单一的、有凝聚力的城市语料库,也是一个独立房屋的聚集体。勒柯布西耶的 Unité d'habitation (1947-1952) 扩展了这种双重解读的谱系。虽然 Unité 将游客视为垂直城市的一个站立的、独特的主体,但它的立面展示了其城市公寓组合的图解表示。Monpazier 的中世纪创始人认为这座城市可以替代他们国王的政治机构。Monpazier 既是一个单一的、有凝聚力的城市语料库,也是一个独立房屋的聚集体。勒柯布西耶的 Unité d'habitation (1947-1952) 扩展了这种双重解读的谱系。虽然 Unité 将游客视为垂直城市的一个站立的、独特的主体,但它的立面展示了其城市公寓组合的图解表示。
更新日期:2021-10-03
down
wechat
bug