当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Griffith Law Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Where ordinary laws fall short: ‘riverine rights’ and constitutionalism
Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2021-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2021.1982119 Elizabeth Macpherson 1 , Axel Borchgrevink 2 , Rahul Ranjan 3 , Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta 4
Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2021-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2021.1982119 Elizabeth Macpherson 1 , Axel Borchgrevink 2 , Rahul Ranjan 3 , Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta 4
Affiliation
Laws that recognise rivers and their ecosystems as legal persons or subjects with their own rights, duties and obligations have been associated with theories of environmental constitutionalism. How...
中文翻译:
普通法律的不足之处:“河流权利”和宪政
承认河流及其生态系统为法人或主体,拥有自己的权利、义务和义务的法律与环境宪政理论联系在一起。如何...
更新日期:2021-07-03
中文翻译:
普通法律的不足之处:“河流权利”和宪政
承认河流及其生态系统为法人或主体,拥有自己的权利、义务和义务的法律与环境宪政理论联系在一起。如何...