AbstractThis article addresses some shortcomings in the standard theory of the phonology-morphology interface within Government Phonology, which is built on the dichotomy of analytic/non-analytic morphology. I argue that many cases which had previously been thought to be analytic and therefore to require a cyclic application of phonology should be reinterpreted without: Many constructions that seemed to consist of domains inside domains are better understood without that internal structure. This alternative avoids some contradictory results of the standard model, which incorrectly precludes certain kinds of interactions between the nested domains. The reinterpretation also makes better sense of the phonological shape of (allegedly analytic) affixes by taking into account phonotactic possibilities of clusters with more than three consonants, which had so no far not received a satisfactory analysis in the Government Phonology literature.

中文翻译：

---

形态学（太）简单了？解析/非解析区分的语音问题和解决方案

摘要本文针对政府音韵学中基于解析/非解析词法二分法的音韵-形态接口标准理论中的一些不足之处。我认为，许多以前被认为是分析性的，因此需要循环应用音系学的案例应该在没有的情况下重新解释：许多似乎由域内部的域组成的结构在没有内部结构的情况下可以更好地理解。这种替代方案避免了标准模型的一些矛盾结果，它错误地排除了嵌套域之间的某些类型的交互。通过考虑具有三个以上辅音的簇的语音可能性，重新解释还可以更好地理解（据称是分析的）词缀的语音形状，