Abstract Whilst the mobilisation practices of human rights organisations before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) have amassed a significant volume of scholarship, the interest in their role in the post-judgement process pales in comparison. This article seeks to contribute to the reversal of this trend by shining a light on Rule 9 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers, which establishes an official avenue for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) to participate in the execution, as opposed to the litigation, of ECtHR decisions. Since its adoption in 2006, the procedure has led to 882 HRO communications and 346 government responses in 356 different cases. This article offers a qualitative empirical study of them. It argues that these organisations resort to activation, contextualisation and pragmatic strategies in pursuit of one overarching goal: preventing the premature closure of international supervision of a case.

中文翻译：

---

在诉讼之外执行权利：在监督 ECtHR 判决执行中制定非政府组织战略

摘要 尽管人权组织在欧洲人权法院 (ECtHR) 上的动员实践积累了大量学术成果，但相比之下，人们对其在判决后过程中的作用的兴趣却相形见绌。本文旨在通过阐明部长委员会规则第 9 条，为扭转这一趋势做出贡献，该规则为非政府组织 (NGO) 和国家人权机构 (NHRI) 的参与建立了官方渠道与诉讼相反，在执行 ECtHR 决定时。自 2006 年通过以来，该程序已在 356 起不同的案件中产生了 882 次 HRO 通信和 346 次政府回应。本文提供了对它们的定性实证研究。它认为这些组织诉诸激活，