当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Int. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? By Shai Dothan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. vii, 161. Index.
American Journal of International Law ( IF 2.989 ) Pub Date : 2021-04-01 , DOI: 10.1017/ajil.2021.5
Salvatore Caserta

tion, one needs not only to be able to read and figure out the extent to which one can accommodate the interest of other states but one needs also to be able to read the personalities of the other participants and understand what levers and methods will be effective in influencing them. In any event, it is clear that if one wants to gather sufficient votes for plenary adoption of legal texts, it is necessary to negotiate an outcome that a large majority of the delegations can support. Negotiating Civil War provides useful background on the development of legal regimes regulating civil wars, both historically and in the three case studies. Lovat makes insightful observations about the roles of various players in the negotiations. His main objective, to develop hypotheses that explain the negotiation of civil war regimes, will be of more interest to international relations theorists than to international law practitioners, particularly lawyers who negotiate multilateral agreements.

中文翻译:

国际司法审查:国际法院何时介入?由 Shai Dothan 撰写。英国剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2020 年。七,161。索引。

一个人不仅需要能够阅读和弄清楚自己在多大程度上可以满足其他国家的利益,而且还需要能够阅读其他参与者的个性并了解哪些杠杆和方法将是有效的在影响他们。无论如何,很明显,如果一个人想要获得足够的票数以使全体会议通过法律文本,就必须通过谈判达成一个大多数代表团都可以支持的结果。内战谈判为规范内战的法律制度的发展提供了有用的背景,包括历史和三个案例研究。Lovat 对谈判中各个参与者的角色进行了深刻的观察。他的主要目标是提出解释内战政权谈判的假设,
更新日期:2021-04-01
down
wechat
bug