Resilience challenges for cities require bridging the gap between theorized concepts, such as resilience attributes, and its application to urban planning. Resilience attributes have been used by international policy initiatives to guide urban resilience without paying attention to how these attributes are represented in public policies. We present an analytical approach to examine the application of resilience attributes in resilience public policy. We apply our approach to evaluate the design of the Resilience Strategy developed for Mexico City under the 100 Resilient Cities Program. We find that creating tangible, meaningful action in government for urban resilience is hampered by concepts that cannot easily be translated into urban planning. Our analytical approach allows a practical and systematic assessment of the representation of resilience attributes, offering an opportunity to adjust and reframe the design of resilience policies balancing scientific knowledge with what is meaningful for decision-makers.

城市的复原力挑战需要弥合理论概念（例如复原力属性）与其在城市规划中的应用之间的差距。国际政策倡议使用弹性属性来指导城市弹性，而没有关注这些属性在公共政策中的表现方式。我们提出了一种分析方法来检查弹性属性在弹性公共政策中的应用。我们应用我们的方法来评估在 100 个弹性城市计划下为墨西哥城制定的弹性战略的设计。我们发现，在政府中为城市复原力制定切实、有意义的行动受到难以转化为城市规划的概念的阻碍。