当前位置: X-MOL 学术Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
CVLT-II short form forced choice recognition in a clinical dementia sample: Cautions for performance validity assessment
Applied Neuropsychology: Adult ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-30 , DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2079088
Karl S Grewal 1 , Michaella Trites 2 , Andrew Kirk 3 , Stuart W S MacDonald 4 , Debra Morgan 5 , Rory Gowda-Sookochoff 1 , Megan E O'Connell 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

Performance validity tests are susceptible to false positives from genuine cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia); this has not been explored with the short form of the California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II-SF). In a memory clinic sample, we examined whether CVLT-II-SF Forced Choice Recognition (FCR) scores differed across diagnostic groups, and how the severity of impairment [Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)] modulated test performance. Three diagnostic groups were identified: subjective cognitive impairment (SCI; n = 85), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI; n = 17), and dementia due to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD; n = 50). Significant group differences in FCR were observed using one-way ANOVA; post-hoc analysis indicated the AD group performed significantly worse than the other groups. Using multiple regression, FCR performance was modeled as a function of the diagnostic group, severity (MMSE or CDR-SOB), and their interaction. Results yielded significant main effects for MMSE and diagnostic group, with a significant interaction. CDR-SOB analyses were non-significant. Increases in impairment disproportionately impacted FCR performance for persons with AD, adding caution to research-based cutoffs for performance validity in dementia. Caution is warranted when assessing performance validity in dementia populations. Future research should examine whether CVLT-II-SF-FCR is appropriately specific for best-practice testing batteries for dementia.



中文翻译:

临床痴呆样本中的 CVLT-II 简短形式强制选择识别:绩效有效性评估的注意事项

摘要

性能效度测试容易受到来自真正认知障碍(例如痴呆)的假阳性的影响;加州语言学习测试 II (CVLT-II-SF) 的简写形式尚未对此进行探讨。在记忆诊所样本中,我们检查了 CVLT-II-SF 强制选择识别 (FCR) 评分是否在诊断组之间存在差异,以及损伤的严重程度如何 [Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Box (CDR-SOB) 或简易精神状态检查(MMSE)] 调制的测试性能。确定了三个诊断组:主观认知障碍(SCI;n  = 85)、遗忘性轻度认知障碍(a-MCI;n  = 17)和阿尔茨海默病引起的痴呆(AD;n  = 50)。使用单向方差分析观察到 FCR 的显着组差异;事后分析表明,AD 组的表现明显低于其他组。使用多元回归,将 FCR 性能建模为诊断组、严重性(MMSE 或 CDR-SOB)及其相互作用的函数。结果对 MMSE 和诊断组产生了显着的主效应,并具有显着的交互作用。CDR-SOB 分析不显着。损伤的增加不成比例地影响了 AD 患者的 FCR 表现,增加了基于研究的痴呆表现效度的临界值。在评估痴呆人群的表现效度时需要谨慎。未来的研究应检查 CVLT-II-SF-FCR 是否适用于痴呆症最佳实践测试电池。

更新日期:2022-05-31
down
wechat
bug