Purpose: This systematic review investigates the methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual/reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. Methods: We included empirical studies of all design types that collected any self-reported primary data related to SRH/GBV using information and communication technology, in the absence of in-person interactions, from women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings. The search was run in March 2021 without filters or limits in Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Scopus. Quality was assessed using an adapted version of the MMAT tool. Two reviewers independently determined whether each full text source met the eligibility criteria, and conflicts were resolved through consensus. A-priori extraction fields concerned methodological rigor and ethical considerations. Results: 21 total studies were included. The majority of studies were quantitative descriptive, aiming to ascertain prevalence. Telephone interviews, online surveys, and mobile applications, SMS surveys, and online discussion forums were used as remote data collection tools. Key methodological considerations included the overuse of non-probability samples, lack of a defined sampling frame, the introduction of bias by making eligibility contingent on owning/accessing technology, and the lack of qualitative probing. Ethical consideration pertained to including persons with low literacy, participant safety, use of referral services, and the gender digital divide. Conclusion: Findings are intended to guide SRH/GBV researchers and academics in critically assessing methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure SRH and GBV in humanitarian and fragile settings.

目的：本系统评价调查使用远程数据收集工具来衡量人道主义和脆弱环境中妇女和女孩的性/生殖健康 (SRH) 和基于性别的暴力 (GBV) 结果的方法和伦理影响。方法：我们纳入了所有设计类型的实证研究，这些研究使用信息和通信技术收集了任何自我报告的与 SRH/GBV 相关的原始数据，在没有面对面互动的情况下，来自人道主义和脆弱环境中的妇女和女孩。该搜索于 2021 年 3 月在 Ovid Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 Scopus 中进行，没有过滤或限制。使用改编版的 MMAT 工具评估质量。两名审稿人独立确定每个全文来源是否符合资格标准，并通过协商一致解决冲突。先验提取领域涉及方法的严谨性和伦理考虑。结果：共纳入 21 项研究。大多数研究是定量描述性的，旨在确定患病率。电话采访、在线调查和移动应用程序、短信调查和在线讨论论坛被用作远程数据收集工具。关键的方法考虑因素包括过度使用非概率样本、缺乏明确的抽样框架、通过使资格取决于拥有/访问技术而引入偏差以及缺乏定性探索。道德考虑涉及包括识字率低的人、参与者的安全、转诊服务的使用和性别数字鸿沟。结论：研究结果旨在指导 SRH/GBV 研究人员和学者批判性地评估使用远程数据收集工具在人道主义和脆弱环境中测量 SRH 和 GBV 的方法和伦理影响。