AbstractFinnish wh-movement exhibits internal roll-up movement with pied-piping and is therefore overtly successive-cyclic. On the other hand, its morphosyntax is nonlocal, suggesting countercyclic behavior. The existence of overtly cyclic computations and nonlocal agreement penetrating nearly every cyclic domain constitutes a near contradiction in this language. A solution is proposed which partially resurrects the notion of d-structure: grammatical operations are cyclic and operate in small phases (as indicated by Finnish successive cyclic wh-movement), but some operations, Agree in particular, access leftover copies of elements in situ and are not restricted by the phase impenetrability condition (PIC). PIC restricts operator/A-bar movement, not morphosyntax.

中文翻译：

---

关于芬兰语语法规则排序的若干问题

摘要芬兰的 wh 运动表现出带有花边的内部卷起运动，因此是明显的连续循环。另一方面，它的形态句法是非局部的，表明反循环行为。明显循环计算的存在和几乎渗透到每个循环域的非局部一致性在这种语言中构成了一个近乎矛盾的地方。提出了一种解决方案，它部分地复活了 d 结构的概念：语法操作是循环的，并且在小阶段中操作（如芬兰连续循环 wh 运动所示），但某些操作，特别是同意，就地访问元素的剩余副本并且不受相不可穿透条件（PIC）的限制。PIC 限制操作符/A-bar 移动，而不是 morphosyntax。