当前位置: X-MOL 学术Griffith Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Strategies of denial and the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry
Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2020.1819266
Penny Crofts 1
Affiliation  

The recently concluded Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry presented evidence of malfeasance, malpractice, and unethical and criminal behaviour by the banks. This article analyses the narratives proffered by the banks that were reported on the front pages of Australian media during the Royal Commission. This article analyses the strategies of denial and neutralisation used by the banks, including literal denial (nothing happened), interpretive denial (something happened but it’s not what you think) and implicatory denial (it happened but action is not needed and/or possible), and provides insight into the ways powerful institutions and individuals intervene in, construct, and support moral and legal codes.

中文翻译:

拒绝策略和澳大利亚皇家委员会对银行、养老金和金融服务行业不当行为的调查

最近结束的澳大利亚皇家银行、养老金和金融服务行业不当行为委员会提供了银行渎职、渎职、不道德和犯罪行为的证据。本文分析了皇家委员会期间在澳大利亚媒体头版报道的银行提供的叙述。本文分析了银行使用的否认和中和策略,包括字面否认(什么都没发生)、解释性否认(发生了事情但不是你想的那样)和暗示性否认(发生了但不需要和/或可能采取行动) ,并深入了解强大的机构和个人干预、构建和支持道德和法律规范的方式。
更新日期:2020-01-02
down
wechat
bug