AbstractThe paper focuses on the treatment of existential statements (including negative existentials), and critically engages Kripke's recent (2013) volume of John Locke lectures. It discusses Kripke's views, reaches some obvious conclusions about their theoretical adequacy, and contrasts Kripke's analysis with that of Atlas, comparing their adequacy as theories of the linguistic phenomena.

中文翻译：

---

否定存在陈述：Kripke、Strawson 和主题名词短语

摘要本文着重于存在主义陈述（包括否定存在主义）的处理，并批判性地参与了克里普克最近（2013 年）的约翰洛克讲座卷。它讨论了克里普克的观点，得出了一些关于其理论充分性的明显结论，并将克里普克的分析与阿特拉斯的分析进行了对比，比较了它们作为语言现象理论的充分性。