Our response to the essays from Griffith (2022), Liang (2022), and Rogers (2022) addresses three themes we identified in the articles. First, feminist epistemology continues to play a critical role in the development of the study of men and masculinities. Second, structural change is essential to produce healthy masculinities, but we need to better understand the relationship between creating a critical mass of men and bringing about systemic, cultural, and institutional change. And, finally, even though all men must contend with hegemonic socialization, we must also recognize that men of different social identities stand in different relation to hegemonic masculinity.

中文翻译：

---

扩大发展健康男子气概的工作：回复 Griffith (2022)、Liang (2022) 和 Rogers (2022)。

我们对 Griffith (2022)、Liang (2022) 和 Rogers (2022) 的文章的回应涉及我们在文章中确定的三个主题。首先，女权主义认识论继续在男性和男性气质研究的发展中发挥关键作用。其次，结构变革对于产生健康的男性气质至关重要，但我们需要更好地理解创造足够数量的男性与带来系统、文化和制度变革之间的关系。最后，尽管所有人都必须与霸权社会化作斗争，但我们也必须认识到，不同社会身份的人与霸权男性气质的关系不同。