In this article, we make the case for theoretically/logically derived explanatory typologies and their constituent ideal types, arguing that they can provide us with the basis to further understand dynamic and complex contemporary phenomena. We contrast this approach with dominant analytical strategies in international-business research. We show that the greater use of explanatory typologies and their associated ideal types in international-business research facilitates comparisons of similar cases; illuminates key, but relatively under-researched aspects of phenomenon; promotes theory building; and readily supports configurational analyses. By doing this, explanatory typologies can underpin rigorous analyses, and enhance the relevance of research findings on causally complex contemporary phenomena at different analytical levels.

在本文中，我们论证了从理论上/逻辑上推导出的解释类型及其构成的理想类型，认为它们可以为我们进一步理解动态和复杂的当代现象提供基础。我们将这种方法与国际商业研究中的主要分析策略进行对比。我们表明，在国际商业研究中更多地使用解释类型及其相关的理想类型有助于比较类似案例；阐明现象的关键但相对研究不足的方面；促进理论建设；并且很容易支持配置分析。通过这样做，解释性类型学可以支持严格的分析，并增强研究结果在不同分析水平上对因果复杂的当代现象的相关性。