This article examines the approaches taken by the Asian Development Bank Administrative Tribunal and the Administrative Tribunal of the Inter-American Development Bank Group in deciding discrimination claims. The article reviews the basic features of each tribunal before examining their jurisprudence on equality of treatment and issues of information disclosure in discrimination cases. Decisions to date have addressed claims of disparate treatment relating to various aspects of remuneration and benefits as well as allegations of arbitrary treatment vis-à-vis others similarly situated. A few cases have involved allegations of discrimination on the basis of sex/gender, one of several protected grounds in equality law. The number of judicial dissents in discrimination cases suggests that the tribunals have encountered some difficulty in handling them. The article points to a gradual but still incomplete approximation of the decisions of such tribunals to contemporary developments in discrimination law, and suggests a possible way forward.

本文探讨了亚洲开发银行行政法庭和泛美开发银行集团行政法庭在裁定歧视索赔时所采取的方法。本文回顾了各法庭的基本特征，然后研究了它们在歧视案件中的平等待遇和信息披露问题的判例。迄今为止的决定已经处理了与薪酬和福利的各个方面有关的不同待遇的主张，以及关于任意待遇的指控。其他类似情况。少数案件涉及基于性别/性别的歧视指控，这是平等法中几个受保护的理由之一。歧视案件的司法异议数量表明，法庭在处理这些异议​​时遇到了一些困难。文章指出，这些法庭的裁决逐渐但仍不完整地近似于歧视法的当代发展，并提出了一种可能的前进方向。