Contradictory needs for high scalable, high speed, low latency, and low-cost architectures turn researchers’ attention toward optoelectronic architectures. This is due to its ability to provide high scalability and high performance at a manageable cost, by imposing some optical links in suitable locations while designing the architecture. In this paper, the most common optoelectronic architectures are overviewed and evaluated in terms of various topological properties, namely, size, diameter, cost, bisection width, maximum and minimum node degree, and Hamiltonian path and cycle. Thus, most of these architectures are based on Optical Transpose Interconnection System (OTIS). The evaluated optoelectronic architectures in this paper are OTIS-Hypercube, Extended OTIS-n-Cube, Enhanced OTIS-Cube, OTIS-Ring, OTIS k-Ary n-Cube, OTIS-Mesh, OTIS-Mesh of Trees, OTIS Hyper Hexa-Cell, and Optical Chained-Cubic Tree. The obtained results showed the strengths and weaknesses of the mentioned optoelectronic architectures to help designers and developers to investigate and decide on the suitable architecture for their problem of interest.

对高可扩展、高速、低延迟和低成本架构的矛盾需求将研究人员的注意力转向光电架构。这是因为它能够以可管理的成本提供高可扩展性和高性能，通过在设计架构时将一些光链路强加在合适的位置。在本文中，最常见的光电体系结构根据各种拓扑特性进行了概述和评估，即尺寸、直径、成本、二等分宽度、最大和最小节点度以及哈密顿路径和循环。因此，这些架构中的大多数都基于光转置互连系统 (OTIS)。本文评估的光电架构为 OTIS-Hypercube、Extended OTIS- n -Cube、Enhanced OTIS-Cube、OTIS-Ring、OTISk -Ary n -Cube、OTIS-Mesh、OTIS-Mesh of Trees、OTIS Hyper Hexa-Cell 和光链立方树。获得的结果显示了上述光电架构的优缺点，以帮助设计人员和开发人员调查和决定适合他们感兴趣的问题的架构。