当前位置: X-MOL 学术Infant and Child Development › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Broadening perspectives: The case for ecologically valid infant research
Infant and Child Development ( IF 1.776 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-11 , DOI: 10.1002/icd.2328
Katherine T. Volk 1 , Mona M. Abo‐Zena 1
Affiliation  

In response to Byers-Heinlein, Bergmann, and Savalei's call for improved focus on reliability in infant research, this commentary focuses on re-conceptualizing infant development (and subsequent researching of it) in such a way as to highlight the cultural nature of human development and how that must be taken into account in our research approaches. While we agree with the need to work towards more explicit standards in infant research (e.g., reliable measures, standard reporting of effect size and description of the sample), we are concerned that the fixation on measurement of quantitative data eclipses an expanded, culturally and contextually sensitive and inclusive conceptualization of reliable and ecologically valid research, particularly in infancy.

中文翻译:

拓宽视野:生态有效婴儿研究的案例

为响应 Byers-Heinlein、Bergmann 和 Savalei 呼吁提高对婴儿研究可靠性的关注,本评论侧重于重新概念化婴儿发育(及其后续研究),以突出人类发展的文化本质以及在我们的研究方法中必须如何考虑这一点。虽然我们同意在婴儿研究中制定更明确的标准(例如,可靠的测量、效应大小的标准报告和样本描述),但我们担心,对定量数据测量的固定使扩大的、文化和可靠和生态有效研究的上下文敏感和包容性概念化,特别是在婴儿期。
更新日期:2022-05-11
down
wechat
bug