当前位置: X-MOL 学术Hypertension › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Performance of a Multianalyte ‘Rule-Out’ Assay in Pregnant Individuals With Suspected Preeclampsia
Hypertension ( IF 8.3 ) Pub Date : 2022-05-12 , DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.122.19038
Maged M Costantine 1 , Baha Sibai 2 , Allan T Bombard 3 , Mark Sarno 4 , Holly West 5 , David M Haas 6 , Alan T Tita 7 , Michael J Paidas 8 , Erin A S Clark 9 , Kim Boggess 10 , Chad Grotegut 11 , William Grobman 12 , Emily J Su 13 , Irina Burd 14 , George Saade 5 , Martin R Chavez 15 , Michael J Paglia 16 , Audrey Merriam 8 , Carlos Torres 17 , Mounira Habli 18 , Georges Macones 19 , Tony Wen 20 , James Bofill 20 , Anna Palatnik 21 , Rodney K Edwards 22 , Sina Haeri 23 , Pankaj Oberoi 24 , Amin Mazloom 24 , Matthew Cooper 24 , Steven Lockton 24 , Gary D Hankins 5
Affiliation  

Background:The ability to diagnose preeclampsia clinically is suboptimal. Our objective was to validate a novel multianalyte assay and characterize its performance, when intended for use as an aid to rule-out preeclampsia.Methods:Prospective, multicenter cohort study of pregnant individuals presenting between 280/7 and 366/7 weeks’ with preeclampsia-associated signs and symptoms. Individuals not diagnosed with preeclampsia after baseline evaluation were enrolled in the study cohort, with those who later developed preeclampsia, classified as cases and compared with a negative control group who did not develop preeclampsia. Individuals with assay values at time of enrollment ≥0.0325, determined using a previously developed algorithm, considered at risk. The primary analysis was the time to develop preeclampsia assessed using a multivariate Cox regression model.Results:One thousand thirty-six pregnant individuals were enrolled in the study cohort with an incidence of preeclampsia of 30.3% (27.6%–33.2%). The time to develop preeclampsia was shorter for those with an at-risk compared with negative assay result (log-rank P<0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio of 4.81 [3.69–6.27, P<0.0001]). The performance metrics for the assay to rule-out preeclampsia within 7 days of enrollment showed a sensitivity 76.4% (67.5%–83.5%), negative predictive value 95.0% (92.8%–96.6%), and negative likelihood ratio 0.46 (0.32–0.65). Assay performance improved if delivery occurred <37 weeks and for individuals enrolled between 28 and 35 weeks.Conclusions:We confirmed that a novel multianalyte assay was associated with the time to develop preeclampsia and has a moderate sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio but high negative predictive value when assessed as an aid to rule out preeclampsia within 7 days of enrollment.Registration:The study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT02780414).

中文翻译:

对疑似先兆子痫的孕妇进行多分析物“排除”测定

背景:临床诊断先兆子痫的能力并不理想。我们的目的是验证一种新型多分析物检测方法并表征其性能,用于辅助排除先兆子痫。方法:对妊娠 28 0/7 至 36 6/7 周之间的孕妇进行前瞻性、中心队列研究患有先兆子痫相关的体征和症状。基线评估后未诊断为先兆子痫的个体被纳入研究队列,其中后来发展为先兆子痫的个体被分类为病例,并与未发展为先兆子痫的阴性对照组进行比较。使用先前开发的算法确定的入组时测定值≥0.0325的个体被视为有风险。主要分析是使用多变量 Cox 回归模型评估发生先兆子痫的时间。 结果:研究队列中纳入了 1,036 名孕妇,先兆子痫的发生率为 30.3% (27.6%–33.2%)。与阴性检测结果相比,高危人群发生先兆子痫的时间较短(对数秩P <0.0001;调整后的风险比为 4.81 [3.69–6.27,P <0.0001])。入组后 7 天内排除先兆子痫的检测性能指标显示,敏感性为 76.4%(67.5%–83.5%),阴性预测值为 95.0%(92.8%–96.6%),阴性似然比为 0.46(0.32– 0.65)。如果分娩发生在 37 周以内且入组时间在 28 至 35 周之间,则检测性能会有所改善。结论:我们证实,一种新型多分析物检测与发生先兆子痫的时间相关,并且具有中等灵敏度和阴性似然比,但阴性预测值较高在入组后 7 天内进行评估,以排除先兆子痫。 注册:该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(标识符 NCT02780414)。
更新日期:2022-05-12
down
wechat
bug