It is often taken for granted that monitoring stands in some kind of tension with trusting (e.g., Hieronymi 2008; Wanderer and Townsend 2013; Nguyen forthcoming; McMyler 2011, Castelfranchi and Falcone 2000; Frey 1993; Dasgupta 1988, Litzky et al. 2006) — especially three-place trust (i.e., A trusts B to X), but sometimes also two-place trust (i.e., A trusts B, see, e.g., Baier 1986). Using a case study involving relationship breakdown, repair, and formation, I will argue there are some ways in which monitoring can be conducive to two-place trust, and to instances of three-place trust that are likely to be repeated over time—especially when previously established two-place trust has broken down. The result, I hope, is not any kind of abandoning of the important idea that monitoring can undermine trust, but an appreciation of where the conflict between monitoring and trust doesn’t lie – one from which future work will hopefully be better positioned to illuminate where exactly the conflict is.

人们通常认为监控与信任处于某种紧张关系（例如，Hieronymi 2008；Wanderer 和 Townsend 2013；Nguyen 即将到来；McMyler 2011，Castelfranchi 和 Falcone 2000；Frey 1993；Dasgupta 1988，Litzky 等 2006） ——尤其是三地信任（即，A 信任 B 到 X），但有时也有两地信任（即，A 信任 B，参见例如 Baier 1986）。使用一个涉及关系破裂、修复和形成的案例研究，我将论证有一些方法可以促进两个地方的信任，以及随着时间的推移可能会重复的三个地方的信任实例——尤其是当先前建立的两地信任破裂时。我希望结果不是放弃监控会破坏信任的重要观念，不会说谎——希望未来的工作能够更好地阐明冲突的确切位置。