当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research on Social Work Practice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Virtual Support and Intimate Partner Violence Services: A Scoping Review
Research on Social Work Practice ( IF 1.984 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-25 , DOI: 10.1177/10497315221087232
Stephanie L. Baird 1 , Sarah Tarshis 2 , Catherine Messenger 1 , Michaeline Falla 1
Affiliation  

Purpose: This article reports on a scoping review that maps the empirical research on virtual intimate partner violence (IPV) interventions.

Method: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s nine-step scoping review methodology, 25 studies were selected.

Results: The majority of the studies (72%) were published in the United States, and included quantitative (56%), mixed methods (24%), and qualitative study designs (20%). The most frequent focus of the virtual interventions to support survivors of IPV included safety (52%), with other interventions focusing mainly on treatment (36%), and education and prevention (12%). Forms of interventions included interactive, internet-based (72%), smartphone apps (16%), live videoconferencing (8%), and an asynchronous chatroom (4%). Barriers and strengths of virtual IPV interventions are identified.

Discussion: From this analysis, emerging models in virtual IPV intervention are identified, as well as next steps necessary in virtual IPV practice and research. The article concludes with implications for social work practice and research.



中文翻译:

虚拟支持和亲密伴侣暴力服务:范围审查

目的:本文报告了一项范围界定审查,该审查描绘了关于虚拟亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 干预措施的实证研究。

方法:按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的九步范围审查方法,选择了 25 项研究。

结果:大多数研究 (72%) 在美国发表,包括定量 (56%)、混合方法 (24%) 和定性研究设计 (20%)。支持 IPV 幸存者的虚拟干预最常见的重点包括安全 (52%),其他干预主要侧重于治疗 (36%) 以及教育和预防 (12%)。干预形式包括交互式、基于互联网的 (72%)、智能手机应用程序 (16%)、实时视频会议 (8%) 和异步聊天室 (4%)。确定了虚拟 IPV 干预的障碍和优势。

讨论:从该分析中,确定了虚拟 IPV 干预的新兴模型,以及虚拟 IPV 实践和研究中必要的后续步骤。文章最后对社会工作实践和研究产生了影响。

更新日期:2022-04-25
down
wechat
bug