当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Community Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Failing Forward
International Community Law Review Pub Date : 2022-07-07 , DOI: 10.1163/18719732-bja10080
Roojin Habibi 1 , Timothy Fish Hodgson 2 , Steven J. Hoffman 3
Affiliation  

Despite the pandemic’s widespread and transnational impact on human rights, both solidarity and human rights have been side-lined in key intergovernmental discussions on global health law reform to date, while conversations about the development of international human rights law seldom consider global health law’s import to the field. This article argues that in spite of states’ apparent reluctance to reconcile and harmonise global health law and international human rights law for fairer and more effective public health emergency preparedness and response, international law experts and practitioners are well-placed to indirectly influence normative development in this direction, drawing on their past successes in clarifying and elaborating upon informal international legal standards. Merging strengths from existing legal frameworks of global health law and international human rights law, such expert standard setting efforts can help reimagine a “progressively harmonised” framework of legal regimes for public health emergency preparedness and response.

中文翻译:

失败转发

尽管这一流行病对人权产生了广泛和跨国的影响,但迄今为止,在关于全球卫生法改革的重要政府间讨论中,团结和人权都被边缘化,而关于国际人权法发展的对话很少考虑全球卫生法对人权的重要性场。本文认为,尽管各国显然不愿意调和和协调全球卫生法和国际人权法,以实现更公平、更有效的公共卫生应急准备和响应,但国际法专家和从业人员可以间接影响规范发展这一方向,借鉴了他们过去在澄清和阐述非正式国际法律标准方面的成功经验。
更新日期:2022-07-07
down
wechat
bug