Currently, there is little guidance for navigating measurement challenges that threaten construct validity in replication research. To identify common challenges and ultimately strengthen replication research, we conducted a systematic review of the measures used in the 100 original and replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015). Results indicate that it was common for scales used in the original studies to have little or no validity evidence. Our systematic review demonstrates and corroborates evidence that issues of construct validity are sorely neglected in original and replicated research. We identify four measurement challenges replicators are likely to face: a lack of essential measurement information, a lack of validity evidence, measurement differences, and translation. Next, we offer solutions for addressing these challenges that will improve measurement practices in original and replication research. Finally, we close with a discussion of the need to develop measurement methodologies for the next generation of replication research.

中文翻译：

---

构建效度和复制研究的效度：系统评价。

目前，对于在复制研究中威胁结构有效性的测量挑战，几乎没有指导。为了确定共同挑战并最终加强复制研究，我们对 Reproducibility Project: Psychology（Open Science Collaboration，2015 年）的 100 项原始和复制研究中使用的措施进行了系统审查。结果表明，原始研究中使用的量表通常很少或没有有效性证据。我们的系统评价证明并证实了在原始研究和重复研究中严重忽视了结构效度问题的证据。我们确定了复制者可能面临的四个测量挑战：缺乏必要的测量信息、缺乏有效性证据、测量差异和翻译。下一个，我们为应对这些挑战提供解决方案，从而改进原始研究和复制研究中的测量实践。最后，我们讨论了为下一代复制研究开发测量方法的必要性。