This commentary includes a series of responses to Wainwright and Weaver’s “A Critical Commentary on the AAG Geography and Military Study Committee Report.” The contributors’ responses vary from the sympathetic to the critical, yet all agree that geographers’ engagements with military and intelligence organizations can be fraught with ethical issues that deserve careful consideration. The aim of this commentary is therefore to contribute to the ongoing debate over ethics and the geography–military nexus.

中文翻译：

---

伦理学和地理-军事关系：对温赖特和韦弗的回应

本评论包括对 Wainwright 和 Weaver 的“对 AAG 地理和军事研究委员会报告的批判性评论”的一系列回应。投稿人的反应从同情到批评不等，但都同意地理学家与军事和情报机构的交往可能充满伦理问题，值得仔细考虑。因此，这篇评论的目的是为正在进行的关于伦理和地理-军事关系的辩论做出贡献。