当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Criminology & Public Policy
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Stacking punishment: The imposition of consecutive sentences in Pennsylvania
Criminology & Public Policy ( IF 5.085 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-25 , DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12587 Miranda A. Galvin 1, 2, 3
Criminology & Public Policy ( IF 5.085 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-25 , DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12587 Miranda A. Galvin 1, 2, 3
Affiliation
This study introduces the decision to impose consecutive sentences as a “window of discretion” in modern sentencing regimes that has the potential to produce extreme and disparate punishment. Among cases sentenced in Pennsylvania between 2015 and 2019, consecutive sentences were present in more than 20% of all cases, including 35% of cases resulting in a primary sentence to prison and 39% of cases resulting in a primary sentence to jail. The length of consecutive incarceration and probation often exceed primary sentence length and substantially extend justice involvement.
中文翻译:
叠加惩罚:宾夕法尼亚州连续判刑
本研究介绍了在现代量刑制度中将连续判决作为“自由裁量权之窗”的决定,这有可能产生极端和不同的惩罚。在 2015 年至 2019 年间在宾夕法尼亚州被判刑的案件中,超过 20% 的案件存在连续判刑,其中 35% 的案件导致初级入狱,39% 的案件导致初级入狱。连续监禁和缓刑的时间通常超过初级刑期,并大大延长了司法参与的范围。
更新日期:2022-04-25
中文翻译:
叠加惩罚:宾夕法尼亚州连续判刑
本研究介绍了在现代量刑制度中将连续判决作为“自由裁量权之窗”的决定,这有可能产生极端和不同的惩罚。在 2015 年至 2019 年间在宾夕法尼亚州被判刑的案件中,超过 20% 的案件存在连续判刑,其中 35% 的案件导致初级入狱,39% 的案件导致初级入狱。连续监禁和缓刑的时间通常超过初级刑期,并大大延长了司法参与的范围。