当前位置: X-MOL 学术Br. J. Clin. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Epistemic injustice amongst clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers: A qualitative thematic analysis study
British Journal of Clinical Psychology ( IF 3.984 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-24 , DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12368
Olivia Harris 1 , Carina Andrews 1 , Matthew R. Broome 2, 3 , Claudia Kustner 4 , Pamela Jacobsen 1
Affiliation  

Research has suggested people who hear voices may be at risk of epistemic injustice. This is a form of discrimination whereby someone is unfairly judged to be an unreliable knower (testimonial injustice) or is unable to contribute to, and therefore access, concepts that make sense of their experience within mainstream society (hermeneutical injustice). Voice-hearing occurs both in people who are mental health service users and in the general population (clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers, respectively). The degree of distress and impairment associated with voices has been shown to relate to how individuals make sense of their experiences and how others respond to their identity as a voice-hearer. The aim of this study was to explore people's experiences of epistemic injustice in relation to voice-hearing and to understand how these may differ between clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers.

中文翻译:

临床和非临床发声者之间的认知不公正:定性主题分析研究

研究表明,听到声音的人可能面临认知不公正的风险。这是一种歧视形式,某人被不公平地判断为不可靠的认识者(证词不公正),或者无法为理解他们在主流社会中的经历做出贡献并因此无法获得概念(解释学不公正)。心理健康服务使用者和普通人群(分别为临床和非临床听音者)都会出现听音。与声音相关的痛苦和损害程度已被证明与个人如何理解他们的经历以及其他人如何回应他们作为声音听众的身份有关。这项研究的目的是探索人们的
更新日期:2022-04-24
down
wechat
bug