当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophical Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reading phenomenology mechanistically: The way through constraints
Philosophical Psychology ( IF 1.573 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-19 , DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2022.2067035
Michał Piekarski 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Marek Pokropski’s “Mechanisms and Consciousness Integrating Phenomenology with Cognitive Science” reopens the question about the possibility of naturalization of phenomenology. The author adopts the position of nonreductive mechanistic integration, which, he claims, has offered new methodological perspectives for studying complex mental phenomena such as consciousness. In this paper, I outline the context of the discussions on the relationship between phenomenology and cognitive sciences, and (§2) discuss the approach proposed by Pokropski, pointing out the main arguments and the most important research achievements. Then I focus on some difficulties of this position. The first of these I associate with a procedure which I call a dismemberment of phenomenology (§3). The second (§4) concerns the concept of constraint, which is key to Pokropski’s analyzes, and some consequences of its application and alternative reading. Finally, in §5 I draw attention to two difficulties. The first is whether it is possible to read phenomenology in terms of functional analysis; the second is related to the doubt whether psychological or phenomenological functional explanations can be treated as mechanistic (which is a strong premise of Pokropski’s argument). In Conclusion I make an overall assessment of the presented approach.



中文翻译:

机械地阅读现象学:通过约束的方式

摘要

Marek Pokropski 的《将现象学与认知科学相结合的机制和意识》重新开启了关于现象学归化可能性的问题。作者采用非还原机械整合的立场,他声称,这为研究意识等复杂心理现象提供了新的方法论视角。在本文中,我概述了关于现象学与认知科学之间关系的讨论的背景,并(§2)讨论了 Pokropski 提出的方法,指出了主要论点和最重要的研究成果。然后我重点谈谈这个职位的一些难点。我将其中的第一个与我称之为现象学的肢解(§3)的过程联系起来。第二个(§4)涉及约束的概念,这是 Pokropski 分析的关键,以及其应用和替代阅读的一些后果。最后,在第 5 节中,我提请注意两个困难。首先是是否可以从泛函分析的角度来解读现象学;第二个与怀疑心理学或现象学功能解释是否可以被视为机械论有关(这是波克罗普斯基论证的一个强有力的前提)。在结论中,我对所提出的方法进行了总体评估。第二个与怀疑心理学或现象学功能解释是否可以被视为机械论有关(这是波克罗普斯基论证的一个强有力的前提)。在结论中,我对所提出的方法进行了总体评估。第二个与怀疑心理学或现象学功能解释是否可以被视为机械论有关(这是波克罗普斯基论证的一个强有力的前提)。在结论中,我对所提出的方法进行了总体评估。

更新日期:2022-04-20
down
wechat
bug