Background

This paper provides an evidence base for practice in Australia from an integrative literature review of research on co-designing housing with people with an intellectual disability. The study asks: what methods and outcomes have been reported from including people with an intellectual disability in the co-design of their housing?

Method

The integrative review framework described by Whitemore and Knafl (2005) was used to analyse the literature.

Results

The literature searches yielded 16 articles after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Important gaps in the literature were found relating to: co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; the co-designing of housing with people with an intellectual disability; specific frameworks or benchmarks for co-designing with people with an intellectual disability; processes on use of proxies; and on design outcomes.

Conclusions

Considerable work is required to explore and evaluate co-design processes in the design of housing with adults with intellectual disabilities, as well as how the outcomes of these processes are evaluated.

中文翻译：

---

在澳大利亚共同设计智障人士住房：综合文献综述

背景

本文通过对与智障人士共同设计住房的研究进行综合文献回顾，为澳大利亚的实践提供了证据基础。该研究提出：将智障人士纳入其住房的共同设计中，报告了哪些方法和结果？

方法

Whitemore 和 Knafl (2005) 描述的综合审查框架用于分析文献。

结果

在应用纳入和排除标准后，文献检索产生了 16 篇文章。发现文献中的重要空白与以下方面有关： 与智障人士共同设计；与智障人士共同设计住房；与智障人士共同设计的具体框架或基准；使用代理的流程；以及设计成果。

结论

需要做大量工作来探索和评估与智障成年人一起设计住房的协同设计过程，以及如何评估这些过程的结果。