当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Personality › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Personality coherence as a personality dynamics-related concept
Journal of Personality ( IF 5.429 ) Pub Date : 2022-04-08 , DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12717
Małgorzata Fajkowska 1
Affiliation  

Extant theoretical models of personality coherence/incoherence do not sufficiently address the challenge of explaining personality coherence dynamics and the role of psychological mechanisms, including temperament and attention. To overcome these limitations, the Complex-System Approach to Personality (C-SAP) postulates that personality coherence is a within-person structure that arises from the functional consistency/inconsistency between personality traits/types, underlain by specific attentional and temperament mechanisms that have integrative and regulatory potential. The dominant (reactive, regulative) function of stimulation processing in temperament types is the foundation for assessing personality coherence. This paper presents a revised, fine-grained model of personality coherence—originally arising from the C-SAP—that is enriched by a focus on personality coherence dynamics in relation to behavioral consistency. The methodological principles necessary for studying personality coherence dynamics are outlined in detail. This paper also addresses: (a) research methods for relating personality coherence/incoherence to behavioral consistency/inconsistency, and (b) situational contexts that are important to these personality dynamics. In addition, personality coherence dynamics in relation to the self and character and the impact of the C-SAP assumption that behaviors are more stable than traits/types on the relation between personality coherence and behavioral consistency are discussed.

中文翻译:

人格连贯性作为人格动力学相关的概念

现有的人格连贯性/不连贯性理论模型不足以解决解释人格连贯性动态和心理机制(包括气质和注意力)的作用的挑战。为了克服这些局限性,人格复杂系统方法(C-SAP)假设人格连贯性是一种人体内的结构,它产生于人格特征/类型之间的功能一致性/不一致,并以特定的注意力和气质机制为基础。整合和监管潜力。气质类型中刺激处理的主导(反应性、调节性)功能是评估人格连贯性的基础。本文提出了修订后的、人格连贯性的细粒度模型——最初源自 C-SAP——通过关注与行为一致性相关的人格连贯性动态而得到丰富。详细概述了研究人格连贯动力学所需的方法原则。本文还讨论了:(a)将人格连贯性/不连贯性与行为一致性/不一致性联系起来的研究方法,以及(b)对这些人格动态很重要的情境背景。此外,还讨论了与自我和性格相关的人格连贯性动态,以及行为比特质/类型更稳定的 C-SAP 假设对人格连贯性和行为一致性之间关系的影响。详细概述了研究人格连贯动力学所需的方法原则。本文还讨论了:(a)将人格连贯性/不连贯性与行为一致性/不一致性联系起来的研究方法,以及(b)对这些人格动态很重要的情境背景。此外,还讨论了与自我和性格相关的人格连贯性动态,以及行为比特质/类型更稳定的 C-SAP 假设对人格连贯性和行为一致性之间关系的影响。详细概述了研究人格连贯动力学所需的方法原则。本文还讨论了:(a)将人格连贯性/不连贯性与行为一致性/不一致性联系起来的研究方法,以及(b)对这些人格动态很重要的情境背景。此外,还讨论了与自我和性格相关的人格连贯性动态,以及行为比特质/类型更稳定的 C-SAP 假设对人格连贯性和行为一致性之间关系的影响。(b) 对这些人格动态很重要的情境背景。此外,还讨论了与自我和性格相关的人格连贯性动态,以及行为比特质/类型更稳定的 C-SAP 假设对人格连贯性和行为一致性之间关系的影响。(b) 对这些人格动态很重要的情境背景。此外,还讨论了与自我和性格相关的人格连贯性动态,以及行为比特质/类型更稳定的 C-SAP 假设对人格连贯性和行为一致性之间关系的影响。
更新日期:2022-04-08
down
wechat
bug