Since the Good Lives Model’s (GLM) inception, researchers and practitioners have faced questions about its implementation. Programs claiming to use the GLM vary substantially in the extent to which the GLM informs treatment, and no tools exist to monitor therapist fidelity to the GLM. The aim of the current paper is to offer a concrete tool to monitor therapist fidelity to the GLM. The GLM Fidelity Monitoring Tool offers the beginnings of a method for how therapists and supervisors can address the central question of “How well are we implementing the Good Lives Model?” The tool consists of three sections: (i) Fundamental Considerations and Processes, which focus on therapeutic process variables consistent with the GLM but not specific to the GLM, and are rated numerically for fidelity, (ii) GLM-Specific Considerations and Processes, also rated numerically for fidelity, and (iii) Client-Focused GLM Considerations, which are a set of questions exploring the therapist’s progress developing a GLM grounded case formulation and therapy plan for individual clients. The tool is designed to help guide supervision discussions and promote therapist fidelity to the GLM. Future research implications are discussed.

自美好生活模型 (GLM) 诞生以来，研究人员和从业者就面临着对其实施的质疑。声称使用 GLM 的计划在 GLM 告知治疗的程度上有很大差异，并且没有工具可以监控治疗师对 GLM 的忠诚度。本论文的目的是提供一个具体的工具来监测治疗师对 GLM 的忠诚度。GLM 保真度监控工具为治疗师和主管如何解决“我们在实施美好生活模型方面做得如何？”这一核心问题提供了一种方法的开端。该工具由三个部分组成：(i) 基本注意事项和过程，重点关注与 GLM 一致但不特定于 GLM 的治疗过程变量，并根据保真度进行数字评级，(ii) GLM 特定注意事项和过程，还对保真度进行了数字评分，以及 (iii) 以客户为中心的 GLM 考虑因素，这是一组问题，探讨了治疗师为个别客户制定基于 GLM 的案例制定和治疗计划的进展。该工具旨在帮助指导监督讨论并促进治疗师对 GLM 的忠诚度。讨论了未来的研究意义。