Day reporting centers (DRCs) vary considerably in how participant eligibility is determined and to date, there is little to no knowledge whether criteria for DRC eligibly are appropriately applied in program entrance. This study examines a statewide sample of individuals in community supervision settings and compares DRC eligibility criteria between DRC and non-DRC participants to examine differences between DRC participants and non-participants. Using a propensity score matched sample of 1,554 participants, study findings suggest that DRC participants show higher risk, need, and responsivity factors, consistent with the DRC programing model. These results suggest many individuals appear to be appropriately matched to DRCs, which may in turn, may influence their likelihood of program success, among other factors.

中文翻译：

---

日报告中心参与者的计划资格评估

日间报告中心 (DRC) 在确定参与者资格的方式上差异很大，迄今为止，几乎不知道 DRC 的标准是否适用于项目入学。本研究检查了全州范围内社区监督环境中的个人样本，并比较了 DRC 和非 DRC 参与者之间的 DRC 资格标准，以检查 DRC 参与者和非参与者之间的差异。使用倾向评分匹配的 1,554 名参与者样本，研究结果表明，DRC 参与者表现出更高的风险、需求和响应因素，这与 DRC 计划模型一致。这些结果表明，许多人似乎与 DRC 相匹配，这反过来可能会影响他们计划成功的可能性，以及其他因素。