当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Psychologist › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are illiberal acts unethical? APA’s Ethics Code and the protection of free speech.
American Psychologist ( IF 16.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-21


The American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (American Psychological Association, 2017b; hereinafter referred to as the Ethics Code) does not contain an enforceable standard regarding psychologists’ role in either honoring or protecting the free speech of others, or ensuring that their own free speech is protected, including an important corollary of free speech, the protection of academic freedom. Illiberal acts illegitimately restrict civil liberties. We argue that the ethics of illiberal acts have not been adequately scrutinized in the Ethics Code. Psychologists require free speech to properly enact their roles as scientists as well as professionals who wish to advocate for their clients and students to enhance social justice. This article delineates criteria for what ought to be included in the Ethics Code, argues that ethical issues regarding the protection of free speech rights meet these criteria, and proposes language to be added to the Ethics Code.

中文翻译:

不自由的行为是不道德的吗?APA 的道德规范和保护言论自由。

美国心理学会 (APA)的心理学家伦理原则和行为准则(美国心理学会,2017b;以下简称道德守则)不包含关于心理学家在尊重或保护他人言论自由或确保他们自己的言论自由受到保护方面的作用的可执行标准,包括一个重要的推论言论自由,学术自由的保障。非法行为非法限制公民自由。我们认为,在道德规范中没有对非自由行为的道德进行充分审查。心理学家需要言论自由来适当地扮演科学家以及希望为客户和学生倡导以增强社会正义的专业人士的角色。本文描述了道德规范中应包含的标准,
更新日期:2022-03-21
down
wechat
bug