当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soil Tillage Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
No-till farming and greenhouse gas fluxes: Insights from literature and experimental data
Soil and Tillage Research ( IF 6.5 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-16 , DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2022.105359
S.J. Ruis 1 , H. Blanco-Canqui 1 , P.J. Jasa 2 , V.L. Jin 3
Affiliation  

Tillage intensity may differently impact gaseous losses of C and N to the atmosphere, but data from long-term experiments are relatively few. Yet, this information is needed to better understand C and N losses and gains in agricultural systems. The objective of this study was to determine how tillage intensity affects soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes (CO2, N2O, and CH4) by comparing experimental data from moldboard plow (MP), chisel plow (CP), double disk (DD), and no-till (NT) soils after 38–40 yr of management in a rainfed corn (Zea mays L.)- soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) cropping system. We also reviewed global literature to evaluate the impacts of tillage on soil GHG emissions. After 38–40 yr of management, CO2 fluxes decreased in this order: MP > CP ≈ DD > NT, indicating that as tillage intensity decreased, CO2 fluxes decreased. Indeed, daily CO2 fluxes were typically lower under NT than under MP and CP. Similarly, the overall cumulative CO2 fluxes across 26-mo of measurement were 1.4–1.8 times lower with NT than MP, CP, and DD soils. Also, MP soils had 1.3 times higher CO2 fluxes than CP and DD soils. These results are similar to those from our global literature review of 60 studies on CO2 fluxes. The reduction in CO2 fluxes in NT was likely due to a combination of increased residue cover, reduced soil temperature (r = 0.71; n = 12; p < 0.001), and increased water content (r = −0.75; n = 12; p < 0.001). Daily N2O and CH4 fluxes were highly variable; and cumulative fluxes across the 26-mo study were unaffected by tillage, mirroring findings of our literature review of 37 papers on N2O fluxes and 24 on CH4 fluxes. Overall, based on the data from both the long-term experiment and literature review, NT appears to be the best option to reduce losses of CO2 followed by reduced till (DD), but N2O and CH4 fluxes do not generally differ with tillage intensity.



中文翻译:

免耕农业和温室气体通量:来自文献和实验数据的见解

耕作强度可能会不同地影响 C 和 N 向大气中的气体损失,但来自长期实验的数据相对较少。然而,需要这些信息来更好地了解农业系统中碳和氮的损失和收益。本研究的目的是通过比较来自犁板犁 (MP)、凿犁 (CP)、双圆盘的实验数据,确定耕作强度如何影响土壤温室气体 (GHG) 通量(CO 2、N 2 O 和 CH 4 ) (DD) 和免耕 (NT) 土壤在雨育玉米 ( Zea mays L.)- 大豆 ( Glycine max(L.) Merr) 种植系统。我们还回顾了全球文献以评估耕作对土壤温室气体排放的影响。管理38-40年后,CO 2通量依次降低:MP > CP ≈ DD > NT,说明随着耕作强度的降低,CO 2通量下降。实际上,NT 下的每日 CO 2通量通常低于 MP 和 CP 下。同样,在 26 个月的测量过程中,NT 的总累积 CO 2通量比 MP、CP 和 DD 土壤低 1.4-1.8 倍。此外,MP 土壤的 CO 2通量是 CP 和 DD 土壤的 1.3 倍。这些结果与我们对 60 项 CO 2通量研究的全球文献回顾得出的结果相似。CO 2的减少NT 的通量可能是由于残渣覆盖增加、土壤温度降低(r = 0.71;n = 12;p  < 0.001)和含水量增加(r = -0.75;n = 12;p  < 0.001)的组合。每日 N 2 O 和 CH 4通量变化很大;整个 26 个月研究中的累积通量和累积通量不受耕作的影响,这与我们对 37 篇关于 N 2 O 通量和 24 篇关于 CH 4通量的论文的文献回顾的结果一致。总体而言,根据长期实验和文献回顾的数据,NT 似乎是减少 CO 2损失的最佳选择,其次是减少耕作 (DD),但 N 2 O 和 CH 4通量一般不随耕作强度而变化。

更新日期:2022-03-16
down
wechat
bug