This commentary complements Macaulay et al.'s thoughtful and valuable perspective by attending to some additional matters of theoretical, ethical, and practical importance. First, I argue for how consideration of multiple levels of complementarity between processes in mindfulness and nature experience allow more powerful integrations than building on apparent synergies. Second, I outline how an understanding of mindfulness as a practice and training can illuminate relationships between states, traits and values of equal relevance for human health and sustainable transitions. Third, I discuss some caveats and considerations in planning for mindfulness, pointing to insights that researchers and professionals committed to sustainable cities can gain from “McMindfulness” debates and other controversies around meditation before outlining some tentative ideas for how urban environmental design could support mindful living and mindful action.

这篇评论通过关注一些具有理论、伦理和实践重要性的额外问题，补充了麦考利等人的深思熟虑和有价值的观点。首先，我主张考虑正念和自然体验过程之间的多层次互补性，如何允许比建立明显的协同作用更强大的整合。其次，我概述了将正念理解为一种实践和培训如何阐明与人类健康和可持续转型同等相关的状态、特征和价值观之间的关系。第三，我讨论了在计划正念时的一些注意事项和注意事项，